Kamala Harris, the Vice President of the United States, has been under scrutiny for her handling of immigration and border issues. Critics and supporters alike have closely monitored her actions and decisions in these areas. In this article, we delve into what Kamala Harris did and didn’t do regarding immigration and the border.
What Kamala Harris Did:
1. Addressing Root Causes: One of the key aspects of Harris’s approach to immigration was to address the root causes that drive people to migrate from Central American countries. She engaged in diplomatic talks with leaders from Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador to understand and tackle the underlying issues such as poverty, violence, and corruption.
2. Task Force on Central America: Harris played a pivotal role in creating a task force focused on Central America to coordinate efforts and develop strategies to address the root causes of migration. This task force aimed to promote economic development, human rights, and good governance in the region.
3. Partnership with Mexico: Harris worked to strengthen partnerships with Mexico to enhance border security and curb irregular migration. She engaged in discussions with Mexican officials to collaborate on addressing the challenges at the US-Mexico border.
What Kamala Harris Didn’t Do:
1. Physical Visit to the US-Mexico Border: Despite criticisms and calls from political opponents to visit the US-Mexico border to witness the situation firsthand, Kamala Harris did not physically visit the border until several months into her role as the point person on immigration. This absence was perceived by some as a lack of urgency in addressing border issues.
2. Concrete Policy Changes: While Harris focused on addressing root causes and engaging in diplomatic efforts, some critics argued that she did not implement significant policy changes to address the crisis at the border effectively. There were calls for more tangible actions such as changes in immigration policies or border security measures.
3. Transparency and Communication: Harris faced criticisms for the perceived lack of transparency and communication regarding her responsibilities and actions concerning immigration and the border. Some critics argued that there was a lack of clarity in her approach and decision-making process.
In conclusion, Kamala Harris made efforts to address the root causes of migration and engage in diplomatic efforts to tackle challenges at the border. However, criticisms arose regarding her physical presence at the border, concrete policy changes, and transparency in communication. As Vice President, Harris continues to face scrutiny and challenges in navigating the complex issues surrounding immigration and the border.
